Green biotechnology, government policies, taxes, barriers and all that Essay

atomic number 19 bioengineering, government policies, taxes, barriers and all that include government policies for commons biotech. deadline 2 - Essay ExampleRegulation of Green Biotech The potential for human health risks and purlieual impairment has necessitated the need for the government to monitor and regulate the release of genetically modified (GM) organism in the environment and commercialization of GM food products. The Brazil government uses the precautionary principle in the regulation of biotechnology products. This is with respect to the environmental safety and consumer health. The precautionary principle is used when there is a threat of repellant damage to human health or the environment. Innovation in agriculture biotechnology depends on the expertness of sharp property rights. The World Intellectual Property Organization manages and protects international intellectual property and ensures countries dedication to fight biotech piracy. Governments have establ ished transparent judicial mechanism to enable firms to complain about intellectual property violation, and provide resources to the enforcement of property rights (Gaisford and William 61-69). In U.S, the efficacy and the safety of an agricultural product should be present to regulatory agencies before it is commercialized. The agencies also conduct a risk assessment to ensure safety of GMOs in laboratories or green house (Joyia 20-21) Barriers to green biotechnology The lack of appropriate technology is a wide obstacle in the attempt to apply biotechnology to benefit the developing countries. This is brought about by technologies be demonstrable in advanced nations and take time to diffuse to developing countries. Another problem is the love of intellectual property rights. Companies in advanced nations own most of the patents for green biotech. These companies have to be adequately compensated in order to allow access to their invention. Other obstacles to green biotech incl ude the lack of market mechanism, poverty and disparities between nations, local and regional politics, biosafety issues, limited infrastructure for exploiting biotechnology, and the biotech debate waged in potential donor countries (Acquaah 460). Ways in which Green biotech can be best traded? Most developing countries can cover transgenic crops to increase food production in the market and shore in more money to the farmer. Green biotechnology may not be the ultimate solution to hunger and malnutrition, but it can bring about increased, environmental friendly, sustainable and economically profitable agricultural growth. Most developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa, for face, have high hopes of producing high yields of transgenic crops to reduce threats of food security. Food insecurity is brought about by drought, plant louse pest infestation, viral and fungal diseases that result into severe crop loss. The potentiality of agricultural biotechnology in Sub-Saharan countri es lies in producing hard crops to withstand the various natural risks. The sub- Saharan biodiversity resource provides possibilities for developing impertinently genetic traits. These traits can be used in transgenic crops through regulatory processes and well- funded innovative research to induce environmentally friendly and new varieties that are harder than existing varieties. Cases of scientific success in developing countries provide that green biotech can change the local economy and reduce food security concerns. The famous example of technology beneficial impact on agricultural production is the green revolution. In Kenya, scientists have developed