Tuesday, April 30, 2019

A Primer in the Politics of the War on Terror Essay

A Primer in the Politics of the War on Terror - Essay ExampleThe U.S. led War on Terrorism is directed to its inevitable end, rather endlessness, given the shifting paradigms of the war and the impact of war actions and consequences on ball-shaped terrorist networks. The war, which began on a hysterical note at the 9/11 U.S. attacks by the al floor was fought relentlessly by the U.S - initially on Afghanistan, alleged to be the homeland of al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden, the overlord brain behind the terrorist attacks, and then on Iraq, for their suspected links with the al Qaeda, and the potential threats from Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). No sooner did the War on Terrorism became War on Iraq, aimed at ousting Saddam Hussein and the establishment of democracy in Iraq, strategically naming the war Operation Iraqi Freedom, as America advanced its strategic and political interests in the Arab world. According to a 2004 report released by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, the U.S. actions in Iraq since 2003 March has attenuate the global counter-terrorism coalition, which seemed formidable in 2001 however, war on terrorism was effective in revitalizing and motivating the al Qaeda network, Strategic Survey 2003/04, 2004 As the war continues to be waged extending geographical territories, the enemy seems all the more opposed and ever-more prevailing, as new cohorts of terrorists emerge to be potential threat to the U.S. and its allies in the Western world. The human, economic, brotherly costs and consequences of Americas War on Terrorism have been appalling and still continue to mount. The dismal and absolutely avoidable war consequences aggravates the need for a critical review of the politics behind Bush Administrations so-called War on Terrorism - the legality, the solid intentions, the propaganda, the schemes, and the roles and responsibilities of all those involved and concerned - resulting in one of the most demoralizi ng episode in the tale of humanity, no less than Hitlers Holocaust. Role of President and the sexual relation In the wake of the shocking September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001, President Bush dubbed the terrorist attack as acts of war, and proclaimed a global war on terrorism (GWOT). The Presidents hastiness in declaring war on an enemy not so advantageously defined, and his declaration that al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters were unlawful enemy combatants, rather than criminals, has been subject to critical analysis. Feldman, 2002 However his decision to endue troops to combat without seeking a congressional declaration of war, Ramsay, 2002 and expansion of his Presidential authority facilitating non-constitutional actions including the keeping of prisoners without judicial review and approving torturous interrogation techniques Seelye, 2001, Fisher, 2001 have been unilateral and critically grave violations of the U.S Constitution. The coition al so played a crucial role- despite protests, objections and voices of dissent from all quarters including the United Nations, the Congress categorically supported Presidents non-constitutiona

No comments:

Post a Comment